In 2012, a meta-analysis of online dating research by five U. do not always improve romantic outcomes; indeed, they sometimes undermine such outcomes.” The report continues: “By suggesting that compatibility can be established from a relatively small bank of trait-based information about a person—whether by a matchmaker’s algorithm or by the user’s own glance at a profile— online dating sites may be supporting an ideology of compatibility that decades of scientific research suggests is false.” Still, the now-ubiquitous smartphone promises more of the same—with the addition of GPS technology and social network integration.S.-based psychologists concluded just the opposite: “The ways online dating sites typically implement [their] services . The search for mates (or the temptation to search for mates) will soon be mobile and transparent, and it will be constant.“We will reach a point when people don’t distinguish between meeting online and off-line,” he says.
Eliezer sets out for Mesopotamia; he returns with the young and virtuous Rebekah, who becomes Isaac’s bride.But as dating-through-device becomes a primary medium for romance, it seems likely that our end goal—traditionally commitment, and often marriage—will also change.Online dating has already altered our romantic psyche—most significantly by assuring us that new options are always waiting.Why settle down when a better match is just a click away?
And where is the incentive to work through relationship difficulty when it’s so easy to access alternatives?
“The other side is there will be more breakups, because people won’t feel imprisoned in relationships that aren’t right.” And that, Slater and others predict, could erode the values of commitment.