Principle of carbon dating


There is no other way to verify the calibration charts accurately! In 2004, the claimed reliability of radiocarbon dating supposedly got a boost to 26,000 years, and then again in 2010 back to 50,000 years ago - the point at which there is too little carbon-14 to measure accurately.Scientists, however, will push the envelope to 10,000 B. Scientists now claim 50,000 years is as far back as this method can go.C." When comparing radiocarbon dates with dates derived from tree rings, known as dendrochronological dating, the dates only agree accurately as far back as A. 640, and only generally well back to the time of Christ.Anything further back and the dates are as much as 800 years off.



intcal extended radiocarbon dates beyond the limit of dendrochronology by basing it on "matched uranium series and radiocarbon dates on fossil corals, coupled with radiocarbon-dated organic material from laminated marine sediments in the Cariaco Basin, Venzuela" (Mike Walker, ). They apparently increased the effectiveness of radiocarbon dating by basing their calibration charts on radiocarbon-dated coral and sediment layers!Everyone assumes that dates that follow the word "radiocarbon" are accurate, precise and sure. The basic principle of radiocarbon dating is that plants and animals absorb trace amounts of radioactive carbon-14 from carbon dioxide (CO2) in the atmosphere while they are alive but stop doing so when they die.The carbon-14 in a sample decays at a steady rate after it dies, and thus works like a clock. Doesn't that give accurate dates of "prehistoric" civilizations?

Carbon dating is the ultimate benchmark of the evolutionary dating world.

But the new data, combined with what Reimer calls a 'real sense of necessity' among team members to resolve the debates, won the day" (January 15).